Published on 28/07/2021
Thailand tsunami aftermath
  • Some countries unable or unwilling to help own population after natural hazards
  • Aston University research calls for 'just war'-type set of criteria for deciding when intervention is just
  • Study warns of repeat of Myanmar rejecting foreign aid after 2008 cyclone

Natural hazards come in all forms, from the current devastating floods in central Europe to tsunamis such as Boxing Day 2004 that killed 230,000 people in and around Sri Lanka and Thailand.

But despite the outstanding efforts of aid agencies, is there more that the international community can do to alleviate the suffering of millions of people around the world?

That is the focus of vital research being carried out by Dr Lauren Traczykowski, a senior lecturer in law ethics at Aston University.

Dr Traczykowski, who contributed to the Hurricane Katrina response while at the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), spoke about her work as part of the 'Society matters' podcast series, presented by journalist Steve Dyson.

She calls on the international community to agree on a new policy for intervening when sovereign states are unable or unwilling to do so that accounts for international ethical obligations.

She said: “Unwilling countries are those who might be offered assistance but refuse it or refuse to ask for assistance even though they need it. It could be a belief they have it covered, or they might worry that any foreign assistance will overwhelm the domestic response operation.”

Dr Traczykowski explained that in the case of the Boxing Day tsunami there was actually too much of certain things. But she added: “Then there is the worrying reasons of just hubris, arrogance and, most worrying would be something I really hope I am wrong about but assume that I'm not, some leaders don't want to save certain members of their population.

“A natural hazard is a good way to just say 'ignore them, let whatever happen, happen' and carry on with the way they want to run their own government without those people.”

She said an example of this was when Cyclone Nargis struck Myanmar in 2008: “The generals in charge refused international assistance, and then we had the situation where the international community doesn't have a mechanism to provide assistance. There's nothing you can do if a country says no. It becomes a diplomatic issue because you know that they need it but they refuse to take it.

“My issue is responsibility. A state has first order duty to provide for the needs of its citizens, but if a state can't, then the rest of humanity does have this responsibility. So if a state isn't offering these life-saving and life-sustaining mechanisms of support then it has to be elevated to the international community.

“My research says we need to prepare and we need a mechanism for response. If we don't have these things then we are being unethical.”

Dr Traczykowski says a plan needs to be put in place: “Then, if a government can't or won't provide assistance I argue that the plan should adhere to a 'just war'-type set of criteria for deciding when or if intervening is just and therefore ethical.

“As with any decision to utilise military force, the international community really must decide if certain criteria have been met. And, if having met those criteria, an intervention should proceed, so there needs to be something in place that the international community can pull off the shelf and say: ‘This is how we're going to decide’.”

Dr Traczykowski said that unfortunately, the International Law Commission, established by the UN in 1947, has decided against putting any such plan in place.

“We already know that interventions will occur in the aftermath of humanitarian emergencies, genocide, but I ask why not natural hazard environments? The big issue for me is that the political will is not behind the initiative.

“Sadly, I think persuading the international community will take another large-scale natural hazard where a government is either unable or unwilling to respond. All I'm asking for is that we think about the preparedness ahead of time, so I will petition at international forums through disaster ethics and academic channels.”

Notes to editors

About Aston University

Founded in 1895 and a University since 1966, Aston is a long established university led by its three main beneficiaries – students, business and the professions, and our region and society. Aston University is located in Birmingham and at the heart of a vibrant city and the campus houses all the university’s academic, social and accommodation facilities for our students. Professor Alec Cameron is the Vice-Chancellor & Chief Executive.

Aston University was named University of the Year 2020 by The Guardian and the University’s full time MBA programme has been ranked in the top 100 in the world in the Economist MBA 2021 ranking. The Aston MBA has been ranked 12th in the UK and 85th in the world. The University also has TEF Gold status in the Teaching Excellence Framework. 

For media inquiries in relation to this release, contact Sam Cook, Press and Communications Manager, on 0121 204 5065 or email: s.cook2@aston.ac.uk

Sue Smith, Head of Press and Communications
    0121 204 3521
    s.p.smith@aston.ac.uk

Sam Cook, Press and Communications Manager
    0121 204 5065
    s.cook2@aston.ac.uk

Claire Fry, Press and Communications Manager
    0121 204 5068
    c.fry@aston.ac.uk

Rebecca Hume, Press and Communications Manager
    0121 204 5159
    r.hume@aston.ac.uk

Alternatively, email pr@aston.ac.uk

News Archive

Press Team

Media Resources

Brexit Directory

The Conversation

Expert Directory

Share this Article: